Coal by Audre Lorde
I
is the total black, being spoken
from the earth's inside.
There are many kinds of open
how a diamond comes into a knot of flame
how sound comes into a words, coloured
by who pays what for speaking.
Some words are open like a diamond
on glass windows
singing out within the crash of sun
Then there are words like stapled wagers
in a perforated book—buy and sign and tear apart—
and come whatever will all chances
the stub remains
an ill-pulled tooth with a ragged edge.
Some words live in my throat
breeding like adders. Other know sun
seeking like gypsies over my tongue
to explode through my lips
like young sparrows bursting from shell.
Some words
bedevil me
Love is word, another kind of open.
As the diamond comes into a knot of flame
I am Black because I come from the earth's inside
Now take my word for jewel in the open light.
is the total black, being spoken
from the earth's inside.
There are many kinds of open
how a diamond comes into a knot of flame
how sound comes into a words, coloured
by who pays what for speaking.
Some words are open like a diamond
on glass windows
singing out within the crash of sun
Then there are words like stapled wagers
in a perforated book—buy and sign and tear apart—
and come whatever will all chances
the stub remains
an ill-pulled tooth with a ragged edge.
Some words live in my throat
breeding like adders. Other know sun
seeking like gypsies over my tongue
to explode through my lips
like young sparrows bursting from shell.
Some words
bedevil me
Love is word, another kind of open.
As the diamond comes into a knot of flame
I am Black because I come from the earth's inside
Now take my word for jewel in the open light.
Now, I realize there is only a loose connection between my previous blog (namely, the title of coal) and this poem, but what stood out to me more was the theme of words and what is being spoken. In the aforementioned chapter, what struck me as most powerful was her reasoning behind the pointlessness of silence. Essentially her point was that she was only hurting herself by staying silent--if she had, she would have been unable to communicate with those who helped propel her forward into a new life of understanding and acceptance. When she was dealing with cancer she realized that "death...is the final silence" (41). Her point there is that at some point (hopefully in the distant future), we will all die, and then the privilege of speaking will no longer be afforded to us. What we need to do now is take full advantage of our opportunity to speak while we can.
Further, I think that there's another inherent point within that. While she says that we all need to speak up more, even if we need to force ourselves out of our normal silent habit, some people are not able. The reason the feminist movement began was because women didn't have a voice. We had been socialized to believe that our rightful place was beneath men in every aspect of life. Women have had to, and continue to this day, to fight for the voice that didn't exist.
I think this shows a greater importance to what Audre Lorde is saying. So many people (both within the feminist movement, and any other movement) have been born without the privilege to speak. Therefore, to ignore that privilege, is to laugh in the faces of those who live in forced silence.
Further, I think that there's another inherent point within that. While she says that we all need to speak up more, even if we need to force ourselves out of our normal silent habit, some people are not able. The reason the feminist movement began was because women didn't have a voice. We had been socialized to believe that our rightful place was beneath men in every aspect of life. Women have had to, and continue to this day, to fight for the voice that didn't exist.
I think this shows a greater importance to what Audre Lorde is saying. So many people (both within the feminist movement, and any other movement) have been born without the privilege to speak. Therefore, to ignore that privilege, is to laugh in the faces of those who live in forced silence.
I think that it's interesting that you brought up the ability to speak and to converse with one another this week when we are reading "How to Tame a Wild Tongue" for Tuesday. That reading is about her ability to communicate within the Chicano community with so many different types of languages and mixes of language. Not being able to communicate effectively, especially across cultural borders, is a problem within the feminist community as every different sub-section of feminist groups has their own different set of goals for the movement. I just though it was an interesting tie from the Lorde into this week's reading.
ReplyDeleteI really like that poem. And it's very interesting to think about, in light of the readings we've done from *Sister Outsider*. Speech is such an important element of the feminist movement; it essentially is rooted in the struggle women had to be heard, to have the right to speak and be listened to and acknowledged. It definitely ties in with this past week's reading as well, like Melissa said. The question of speech, and the need to speak, and the ability to speak, span across all different aspects and areas of feminism and humanism. I bet it's a topic we'll see come up again before the end of the semester.
ReplyDeleteHi Talya,
ReplyDeleteI'm also very taken by your analysis here, and I would be really interested to see you push this sense of "voice" and "voicelessness" further. One aspect of speech that I think would be interesting for you to consider here is the way in which language is--in and of itself--a mechanism that shapes our ability to think and understand certain concepts. Lots of theorists/philosophers take this idea up, but I think thinking through the ways in which one's "voice" is complicated by the sense of what words are/aren't available for you to use to give voice to your thoughts/ideas could help you to complicate the way in which you're understanding what it means to be denied a voice. For instance, can we imagine a women who can speak--and is heard--but yet still feels "voiceless" because of a lack of vocabulary available to say what she wants to say (and have it be understood)? I wonder if you can use this idea to help you understand what might be at stake in some of our feminists' use (and misuse) of language--as well as their own invented vocabularies for speaking their selves.
Great work here--keep it up!
best,
Dr. R